Retire add-issue-header.yml workflow - #158013
Open
StanFromIreland wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
StanFromIreland wants to merge 1 commit into
StanFromIreland wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
StanFromIreland
requested review from
AA-Turner,
JacobCoffee,
ezio-melotti,
hugovk,
itamaro and
webknjaz
as code owners
September 23, 2026 16:49
zware
approved these changes
Sep 23, 2026
Member
|
Added DNM label to ensure opportunity for discussion so it's not just Stan and I pushing this through in case someone is truly relying on this behavior. |
Member
IIUC it should be uncontroversial to remove this workflow from all non- |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This was added after the switch to issue templates (see #108033 (comment)), however, it's not ideal. It runs after the issue is opened, and edits the existing issue. This means users can run into conflicts if they edit their issue, it pollutes the edit history, and adds information that is already is available in the form of a label (although this is debatable, as the label is quite a bit smaller).
I propose we remove it, what do people think?