Conversation
dlowzzxx
requested review from
SrinivasanTarget,
mykola-mokhnach,
saikrishna321 and
valfirst
as code owners
September 26, 2026 19:51
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Change list
Types of changes
Details
Addresses #2368. Selenium's EventFiringDecorator returns a WebElement interface proxy, while AppiumFieldDecorator intercepts a Method declared by RemoteWebElement. Invoking that Method on the Selenium proxy throws “object is not an instance of declaring class.” The compatible-receiver path remains unchanged, and the fallback invokes the decorated receiver rather than unwrapping it.
Validation on Windows with Temurin 21 and Gradle 9.7.1:
assemble checkstyleMainandgit diff --checkpassed.testran 92 tests: 91 passed; StorageTest failed connecting to the absent local Appium storage service at 127.0.0.1:4723. The same failure occurs on unchanged master. Excluding it, 91/91 passed.checkstyleTestreports the same five missing-Javadoc errors in two untouched test utility files on unchanged master. The new test has no reported violations.Codex assisted with implementation and validation.