Migrate telemetry groovy files to java part 3

[jpbempel]

What Does This Do

we migrate 8 tests:

• DependencyPeriodActionTest
• DependencyResolverQueueTest
• DependencyResolverTest
• DependencyResolverTest
• JarReaderTest
• LocationsCollectingTransformerTest
• EndpointPeriodicActionTest
• LogPeriodicActionTest

Motivation

this is part of the effort to migrate groovy tests to Java/JUnit
part1: #12430
part2: #12461

Additional Notes

Contributor Checklist

• Format the title according to the contribution guidelines
• Assign the type: and (comp: or inst:) labels in addition to any other useful labels
• Avoid using close, fix, or any linking keywords when referencing an issue
  Use solves instead, and assign the PR milestone to the issue
• Update the CODEOWNERS file on source file addition, migration, or deletion
• Update public documentation with any new configuration flags or behaviors
• Once approved, use merge queue to merge the PR

Jira ticket: [PROJ-IDENT]

[dd-octo-sts]

Hi! 👋 Thanks for your pull request! 🎉

To help us review it, please make sure to:

• Add at least one type, and one component or instrumentation label to the pull request

If you need help, please check our contributing guidelines.

[datadog-prod-us1-6]

More details

The Java tests keep the behavior of the removed Groovy tests. The production code change only makes convertToURI visible to package tests.

Was this helpful? React 👍 or 👎

_{Open Bits AI session}

_{🤖 Datadog Autotest · Commit ad46be5 · What is Autotest? · @DataDog review to ask questions · Any feedback? Reach out in #autotest}

[datadog-prod-us1-6]

🎯 Code Coverage (details)
• Patch Coverage: 100.00%
• Overall Coverage: 57.97% (-1.15%)

_{This comment will be updated automatically if new data arrives.
🔗 Commit SHA: ad46be5 | Docs | Give us feedback!}

[dd-octo-sts]

🟢 Java Benchmark SLOs — All performance SLOs passed

Suite	Status
Startup	🟢 pass

SLO thresholds are defined here based on automatically generated metrics. A warning is raised when results are within 5% of the threshold.

PR vs. master results

Scenario	Candidate	master	Δ (95% CI of mean)
startup:insecure-bank:iast:Agent	14.82 s	14.66 s	[+0.3%; +2.0%] (maybe worse)
startup:insecure-bank:tracing:Agent	13.59 s	13.64 s	[-1.0%; +0.3%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:appsec:Agent	17.03 s	16.98 s	[-0.8%; +1.3%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:iast:Agent	16.96 s	17.09 s	[-1.5%; -0.0%] (maybe better)
startup:petclinic:profiling:Agent	16.79 s	16.76 s	[-1.1%; +1.3%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:sca:Agent	17.00 s	16.82 s	[-0.0%; +2.1%] (no difference)
startup:petclinic:tracing:Agent	16.05 s	16.17 s	[-1.6%; +0.2%] (no difference)

Commit: ad46be56 · CI Pipeline · Benchmarking Platform UI

---

Load and DaCapo benchmarks can be triggered manually in the GitLab pipeline. Results will appear in the Benchmarking Platform UI after completion.